ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 974
December 27, 2008 10:07 PM
"After not having a club in my hands in 4 years, last weekend I played 18 at King Putt indoor miniature course in Henderson, Nevada. My game has never been better, I believe I shot 6 under. I was amazed at my level of focus, the gallery was loud due to a couple of on going birthdays parties."
I'm hoping my effort and intent to communicate concisely would not be view in a negative light. I do have respect and fear for those on this board who would earn the title grammar gods such as SaquaroBadger. I hope my apology is accepted and mitigates the severity of the punishment handed down by those gods.
p.s. I working on not appearing as the dyslexic athlete with a high school gpa of 1.5, but as the once dyslexic college athlete with a BA degree and two equivalent AA degrees with a gpa of 3.4. No offense taken, mcguda thanks for the laughs
Interact
Posts: 102
NYChez wrote: I've always felt that a new college coach gets three strikes, and close losses (like against Michigan State) don't count as a strike because being competitive against a decent team is a positive. Strike one was the embarrassment against Penn State. Strike two is today's 2nd half - which will be remembered by the national media for a long time (pretty much undoing any goodwill resulting from the exciting '99 Rose Bowl). If Bielema's team tanks again in a game in the first half of next season, then there will be a new head coach on the sidelines in 2010. Coaches that have a good handle on their players do not let their team just roll over on multiple occasions in one season. The fact that both meltdowns occurred in high profile games does not help.
Posts: 29
December 27, 2008 10:11 PM
Posts: 6596
December 27, 2008 10:17 PM
THE JETER
Posts: 1200
December 27, 2008 10:25 PM
Posts: 1726
December 27, 2008 10:30 PM
Posts: 10461
December 27, 2008 10:31 PM
Blissfully Disinterested
Tampabucky wrote: NYChez wrote: I've always felt that a new college coach gets three strikes, and close losses (like against Michigan State) don't count as a strike because being competitive against a decent team is a positive. Strike one was the embarrassment against Penn State. Strike two is today's 2nd half - which will be remembered by the national media for a long time (pretty much undoing any goodwill resulting from the exciting '99 Rose Bowl). If Bielema's team tanks again in a game in the first half of next season, then there will be a new head coach on the sidelines in 2010. Coaches that have a good handle on their players do not let their team just roll over on multiple occasions in one season. The fact that both meltdowns occurred in high profile games does not help. Why isn't the Michigan State loss or the Cal-Poly overtime win strike 2?
Posts: 7699
December 27, 2008 10:35 PM
C.O.F.
December 27, 2008 10:36 PM
Mad Birdman wrote: I actually was thinking this same thing. Can a coach have a bad year or a slump? We used to always be a step ahead of defenses and I'd always feel confident that if we didn't have a great first half of a game that PC would spin the dials and come up with a way to crack a defense. Plays like the TE screen would work and be called at just the right times. There have been too many times this year that I have been screaming at the play calling (3rd and short/4th and short, runs when there should have been passes, trying to outthink everyone bu missing the obvious) and I am losing faith a bit. We always have heard that he was the next coaching hire for someone, but maybe not so much now. To be fair, there have been some nice twists (i.e. the reverse action to Gilreath) this year. I think that PC's hands have been tied by the really limited play at QB.
Posts: 105
December 27, 2008 10:42 PM
Posts: 10775
December 27, 2008 10:46 PM
CportBadger wrote: Bielema is not a classy individual. Regardless of the circumstances, asking him to show class may be a bit of a stretch.
Republicans apparently love government so much they're buying it.
December 27, 2008 10:49 PM
Hey mcguda, no mea culpa required. Just do what I and nearly anyone else does on this board and identify an individual(s) having direct contact or more important, direct control (real or not) on the team, to focus your aggression on, to vent any negative feelings a fan would have with the team's performance today.
Posts: 60
December 27, 2008 10:51 PM
" Barry shouldn't be AD"
Oh stop with the pussy mentality. We just got butt fucked on national tv (best line from Diehard) and you're worried whether it was classy or not? This is a bad year for UW sports unfortunately. Football was terrible. Preseason top 10 and we sucked ass. Basketball looks ok, but far from where they have been. But hey, at least the chick hoops team is doing ok. badgerman27 wrote: He has every right to be pissed about a team throwing the ball in the 4th qtr up 4 tds. Totally classless.
Posts: 6042
December 27, 2008 10:52 PM
DCBadger7 wrote: Mad Birdman wrote: I actually was thinking this same thing. Can a coach have a bad year or a slump? We used to always be a step ahead of defenses and I'd always feel confident that if we didn't have a great first half of a game that PC would spin the dials and come up with a way to crack a defense. Plays like the TE screen would work and be called at just the right times. There have been too many times this year that I have been screaming at the play calling (3rd and short/4th and short, runs when there should have been passes, trying to outthink everyone bu missing the obvious) and I am losing faith a bit. We always have heard that he was the next coaching hire for someone, but maybe not so much now. To be fair, there have been some nice twists (i.e. the reverse action to Gilreath) this year. I think that PC's hands have been tied by the really limited play at QB. I think bitching about the playcalling is a given when a team is losing more than its fans think it should. I also think Chryst isn't quite as good or as bad as he has been portrayed. To me, the lynch pin to all of this is the QB position - we simply have to get better play next season. Consistency AND serviceability are musts. DS had some of the latter, but not much of the former. I've said this before - I don't give a shit who the QB is as long as that player won the job by being a good QB and not simply because he was the lesser of two or three unsavory options.
December 27, 2008 10:53 PM
chedda108 wrote: badgerman27 wrote: He has every right to be pissed about a team throwing the ball in the 4th qtr up 4 tds. Totally classless. as it was mentioned in the Badgerchat, that's what Bobby Bowden & FSU does. Today I realized again why I hate that program.....throwing the ball up by a ton and then the personal fouls and the excessive celebration. Typical FSU. I hope that program never gets back to where it was (and I'm a bit biased since my sister lives in Gainesville so I feel I should cheer for them a little bit, not twhirls cheering on like he does with half the teams in the country, but you know, hope they do well).
badgerman27 wrote: He has every right to be pissed about a team throwing the ball in the 4th qtr up 4 tds. Totally classless.
December 27, 2008 10:55 PM
Posts: 3295
December 27, 2008 10:57 PM
You mess with the bull, you get the horns
December 27, 2008 10:59 PM
Posts: 1809
December 27, 2008 11:20 PM
Jack Tripper
whirly711 wrote: "not twhirls cheering on like he does with half the teams in the country,"
Share This