Replay of Ewing screen pass in Badger Football Board Forum

RSS
Email

0 Points

Replay of Ewing screen pass

Author	Comment
BadgerRoy	Replay of Ewing screen pass		Lead	[-]
Posts: 2269 September 2, 2011 2:21 PM	Remove this ad I have not yet had the benefit of seeing the replay yet but who the f&$% was that replay NOT a TD on the screen pass to Ewing From what they showed on the scoreboard and normal TV highlights it seems like he was in the end zone Any help? ___________________ SPORTS LAW BLOG: www.FromTheBench.us
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
MT24		#1	[url]	[-]
Posts: 6056 September 2, 2011 2:23 PM	In real time from the trailing camera view it looked like he was definitely in but from the goal-line view it looked like his knee and elbow may have touched before the ball crossed the line. Tough call
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
wheresswingtown		#2	[url]	[-]
Posts: 592 September 2, 2011 2:24 PM	TV replay was inconclusive. Really not enough evidence to overturn the call made on the field. His knee and elbow went down simultaneously, you couldn't see if the ball had crossed the goal line or not. -what MT said...
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
dl004d		#3	[url]	[-]
Posts: 281 September 2, 2011 2:49 PM	It was clear from the replay that he was NOT in the end zone. Both reviews were in UNLV's favor, but both were correct. ________________ Follow me on Twitter
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Ol Badger		#4	[url]	[-]
Posts: 23762 September 2, 2011 3:08 PM On hiatus	The UNLV TD was pretty obvious, the Ewing one not. I thought they should have given him the ball to run it in on the next play, just because he earned it. What was more difficult to understand was the interference call on Fenelus in the end zone. He was turned around facing the ball, and was going up for it. Where was the interference? These ARE the good old days!
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
dl004d		#5	[url]	[-]
Posts: 281 September 2, 2011 3:13 PM	That was outrageous. The replay showed that it was a textbook example of great coverage. He had great position. He turned for the ball. I wouldn't have him change a thing. ________________ Follow me on Twitter
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
BigAppleBucky		#6	[url]	[-]
Posts: 10806 September 2, 2011 3:19 PM	Ol Badger wrote: The UNLV TD was pretty obvious, the Ewing one not. I thought they should have given him the ball to run it in on the next play, just because he earned it. What was more difficult to understand was the interference call on Fenelus in the end zone. He was turned around facing the ball, and was going up for it. Where was the interference? Agreed 100%!! I was so happy for him that he scored and then disappointed the call went the other way. EDIT TO ADD A QUESTION: What was the call against Henry? It looked like he just gave a little shove in-bounds, nothing close to late or unnecessary. (I watched in a NYC bar with no sound) Republicans apparently love government so much they're buying it.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
StopAtTheTop		#7	[url]	[-]
Posts: 358 September 2, 2011 3:30 PM Donny	dl004d wrote: It was clear from the replay that he was NOT in the end zone. Both reviews were in UNLV's favor, but both were correct. I would quibble with this a bit. When a replay is clear, the official announces that the call on the field is "confirmed". When the replay is inconclusive, the official announces that the call "stands". They said the call stands. But apart from vocabulary, the replays that were shown on ESPN were not conclusive because there was no camera that had a straight on shot down the goal line. A couple of the replays were from behind Ewing. The best replay was from the back corner of the endzone opposite from where Ewing was trying to cross. There was a UNLV player partially obstructing the view and the angle also made it impossible to tell whether the ball broke the plane before the knee hit the ground. I agree that in real time it looked like there was no way that couldn't have been a TD. The replays were not good, as no camera was in position.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
LeviBooth		#8	[url]	[-]
Posts: 10875 September 2, 2011 6:27 PM	Both replays were correct, the Interfrence call was just terrible - but so was the flag thrown on the UNLV WR...
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
SaguaroBadger		#9	[url]	[-]
Posts: 6985 September 2, 2011 10:24 PM Sully "Football Saturdays in Madison are holy days."	Remove this ad Ol Badger wrote: The UNLV TD was pretty obvious, the Ewing one not. I thought they should have given him the ball to run it in on the next play, just because he earned it. What was more difficult to understand was the interference call on Fenelus in the end zone. He was turned around facing the ball, and was going up for it. Where was the interference? Thank goodness PC doesn't think this way. You do not "reward" players by calling their number, especially after that player has just run 50+ yards on the previous play. You call the play that is most likely going to result in a TD, which is what the Badgers did last night. Barry Alvarez thinks the same way, which is why the Badgers didn't call Dayne's number to get him the Rose Bowl rushing record in the 1999 Rose Bowl (Dayne finished one yard short of the record). To quote Herm Edwards, "YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME." You do not play the game giving a shit who scores your points or what statistics your players accumulate during the game. /rant over I couldn't care less who UW signs -- in hoops, football or hockey. I'm not a fan. --TGP, 26 October 2009
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Ol Badger		#10	[url]	[-]
Posts: 23762 September 2, 2011 10:37 PM On hiatus	SaguaroBadger wrote: Thank goodness PC doesn't think this way. You do not "reward" players by calling their number, especially after that player has just run 50+ yards on the previous play. Oh, come on! It was about 18 inches out, and thanks to the review he had had about 5 minutes to catch his breath. In fact, he was recovered enough to throw a block on the play. These ARE the good old days!
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Rx95		#11	[url]	[-]
Posts: 959 September 2, 2011 11:16 PM	Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought Dayne didn't get the record because BA didn't know that he was so close. Somebody asked BA about it after the game.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
DeMayonnaise		#12	[url]	[-]
Posts: 7081 September 3, 2011 2:45 AM FEAR THE VISOR!	SaguaroBadger wrote: Ol Badger wrote: The UNLV TD was pretty obvious, the Ewing one not. I thought they should have given him the ball to run it in on the next play, just because he earned it. What was more difficult to understand was the interference call on Fenelus in the end zone. He was turned around facing the ball, and was going up for it. Where was the interference? Thank goodness PC doesn't think this way. You do not "reward" players by calling their number, especially after that player has just run 50+ yards on the previous play. You call the play that is most likely going to result in a TD, which is what the Badgers did last night. Barry Alvarez thinks the same way, which is why the Badgers didn't call Dayne's number to get him the Rose Bowl rushing record in the 1999 Rose Bowl (Dayne finished one yard short of the record). To quote Herm Edwards, "YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME." You do not play the game giving a shit who scores your points or what statistics your players accumulate during the game. /rant over Ewing made a helluva block driving his guy nearly into the goalpost on the next play to let White (or was it Ball?) walk in untouched. I'm sure in Ewings might that's just as good as him scoring the touchdown. I honestly don't care about this. Just bored at work and have a lot of desk warming time....
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
BBrownie		#13	[url]	[-]
Posts: 341 September 3, 2011 8:27 AM	DeMayonnaise wrote: Ewing made a helluva block driving his guy nearly into the goalpost on the next play to let White (or was it Ball?) walk in untouched. I'm sure in Ewings might that's just as good as him scoring the touchdown. This. In hindsight, Ewing won't care that they ruled him down at the 1 foot line. The film of him destroying his man on the next play and paving the way for Ball's TD will be prominently featured in draft rooms of teams looking for a fullback.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
4thngoal		#14	[url]	[-]
Posts: 6186 September 3, 2011 8:52 AM Denis Lemieux	I don't know it was Ewing's or White's Screen, but check the replay to see Ryan Groy sprinting 30 yards downfield to escort the screen. <<She kind of looks like Vern Lundquist with a wig on.>> >>Herschey 11-13-12
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
BadgerConvert		#15	[url]	[-]
Posts: 2237 September 3, 2011 9:20 AM Is this thing on?	4thngoal wrote: I don't know it was Ewing's or White's Screen, but check the replay to see Ryan Groy sprinting 30 yards downfield to escort the screen. White's screen. If he had hit anyone with that momentum, they may not have ever gotten up.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
TheArsenal		#16	[url]	[-]
Posts: 324 September 3, 2011 9:37 AM	4thngoal wrote: I don't know it was Ewing's or White's Screen, but check the replay to see Ryan Groy sprinting 30 yards downfield to escort the screen. That was the highlight of the night for me. You never see a lineman flying quite like that.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
BAJJERFAN		#17	[url]	[-]
Posts: 8580 September 3, 2011 9:48 AM	It did cost Wilson a TD pass. I'd like to see him get 50 and White and Ball 20 TDs each. "I knew Jack Schitt. Jack Schitt was a friend of mine and believe me you're no Jack Schitt".
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
SaguaroBadger		#18	[url]	[-]
Posts: 6985 September 3, 2011 11:35 AM Sully "Football Saturdays in Madison are holy days."	Remove this ad Rx95 wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought Dayne didn't get the record because BA didn't know that he was so close. Somebody asked BA about it after the game. Dayne getting the single game Rose Bowl rushing record would have been nice, but ultimately the Badgers didn't need those yards to win the game. Alvarez has said that records should be broken in the context of the game. You don't play for records, or else you have crap like that women's basketball game where the injured player was allowed to score 2 points at the beginning of the game to get a scoring record (LINK). Here's Alvarez's quote (LINK), talking about Dayne not breaking the single game rushing record against Hawaii: "I like to break records, but I think records should be broken in the context of the game," Alvarez said. "There was no reason to put him in to go for an NCAA record. Finally, to quote Dan Hawkins, "IT'S DIVISION ONE FOOTBALL!" It's not goddamn women's basketball or kids' t-ball. I couldn't care less who UW signs -- in hoops, football or hockey. I'm not a fan. --TGP, 26 October 2009
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Replay of Ewing screen pass

Replay of Ewing screen pass