Yuku free message boards

yanked wrote:

---

Azree33 wrote:

---

Yep, TCF - I was just about to reply.

First, mea culpa - my analogy was incorrect. I initially thought that wanked's link said that the NLRB was requesting the information.

Second - TCF is correct. Unions have been able request employee information, and it is illegal for employers to withhold that information, since at least the 60s, and I think it might even go back to the original Wagner Act and National Labor Relations Act that created the NLRB in the 1930s.


In other words, this is another example of conservatives not being upset with government and its laws for the entire history of the law's existence until those who write the talking points memos distribute the outrage.

Sheep.

Its been around since the 1960's.    Names and addresses were required to be provided....what the NLRB now wants is phones numbers and email accounts so they can harass Americans and bully them.   Its an addition to the Excelsior list.....its not the same.   So, suck that for starters   What an assault on democracy, and privacy!   God forbid you had to go with radical progressive ideas and have open elections where people could see how you vote.    Nothing like innocent americans getting bricks thrown through their windows.....

These are bad people that need to go down, probably on each other

yanked wrote:

---

Myles Long wrote:

---

yanked wrote:

---

Azree33 wrote:

---

Yep, TCF - I was just about to reply.

First, mea culpa - my analogy was incorrect. I initially thought that wanked's link said that the NLRB was requesting the information.

Second - TCF is correct. Unions have been able request employee information, and it is illegal for employers to withhold that information, since at least the 60s, and I think it might even go back to the original Wagner Act and National Labor Relations Act that created the NLRB in the 1930s.


In other words, this is another example of conservatives not being upset with government and its laws for the entire history of the law's existence until those who write the talking points memos distribute the outrage.

Sheep.

Its been around since the 1960's.    Names and addresses were required to be provided....what the NLRB now wants is phones numbers and email accounts so they can harass Americans and bully them.   Its an addition to the Excelsior list.....its not the same.   So, suck that for starters   What an assault on democracy, and privacy!   God forbid you had to go with radical progressive ideas and have open elections where people could see how you vote.    Nothing like innocent americans getting bricks thrown through their windows.....

These are bad people that need to go down, probably on each other

Basic contact information.  With the logic and common sense required to understand why this is legal, I'd stick to things more within your wheelhouse.  Gatorade for your workers and good record keeping on hours they work should be about your 40 hr./workweek

Why is it common sense for random people (often violent people) to have access to your home address and phone number.   If an ex husband looks for his ex-wifes address, should HR provide it?

yanked wrote:

---

Myles Long wrote:

---

yanked wrote:

---

Myles Long wrote:

---

yanked wrote:

---

Azree33 wrote:

---

Yep, TCF - I was just about to reply.

First, mea culpa - my analogy was incorrect. I initially thought that wanked's link said that the NLRB was requesting the information.

Second - TCF is correct. Unions have been able request employee information, and it is illegal for employers to withhold that information, since at least the 60s, and I think it might even go back to the original Wagner Act and National Labor Relations Act that created the NLRB in the 1930s.


In other words, this is another example of conservatives not being upset with government and its laws for the entire history of the law's existence until those who write the talking points memos distribute the outrage.

Sheep.

Its been around since the 1960's.    Names and addresses were required to be provided....what the NLRB now wants is phones numbers and email accounts so they can harass Americans and bully them.   Its an addition to the Excelsior list.....its not the same.   So, suck that for starters   What an assault on democracy, and privacy!   God forbid you had to go with radical progressive ideas and have open elections where people could see how you vote.    Nothing like innocent americans getting bricks thrown through their windows.....

These are bad people that need to go down, probably on each other

Basic contact information.  With the logic and common sense required to understand why this is legal, I'd stick to things more within your wheelhouse.  Gatorade for your workers and good record keeping on hours they work should be about your 40 hr./workweek

Why is it common sense for random people (often violent people) to have access to your home address and phone number.   If an ex husband looks for his ex-wifes address, should HR provide it?

Yanked:  Proving other poster's points for thousands of posts and still running strong.  I'm not even going to dignify your lack of intelligence with an answer.  Think you can figure out the distinction and nuance here yourself?  

Go ahead and comment on it.   Why should my personal information be given to random people that I don't want to have it?    This is yet another assault on democracy that you'll have to face up to sooner or later.   Hell, go ahead and post your address, phone number, email address and place of employment.   I work for the union....its all good.

Post your personal info here if its such a good idea......