ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 17430
November 15, 2012 10:36 AM
blockski wrote: So, Obama only wins votes by 'buying' them via promoting policies that those voters will like. Nevermind the question of if these are good policies or not. How is that any different from a bunch of rich guys who want lower taxes voting for the guy that has a policy of lowering taxes on the rich?
Interact
Posts: 5140
November 15, 2012 10:41 AM
November 15, 2012 10:50 AM
TheMonsignor wrote: How so? Largely because of huge military installations. You can argue that military expenditures are more appropriate for the federal government, but now you are just arguing about what sort of "subsidy" you want to give people. I'd argue there is not much difference, in terms of makers v. takers, between a bloated war machine and a bloated food stamp program.
Posts: 7069
November 15, 2012 11:50 AM
yanked wrote:TheMonsignor wrote: How so? Largely because of huge military installations. You can argue that military expenditures are more appropriate for the federal government, but now you are just arguing about what sort of "subsidy" you want to give people. I'd argue there is not much difference, in terms of makers v. takers, between a bloated war machine and a bloated food stamp program.Wow, that would be a stupid argument. At least I get to enjoy the Blue Angels....and watch us blow up shit on TV every now and again. My food stamps benefits include watching to see who gets gunned down every night. I have 3 kids in school between 3rd and 11th grade. For the classmates on gov't bennies, you can follow the lack of improvement through each grade, the faces and stories don't change. Food stamps, public housing, public health, etc aren't changing a fucking thing for kids at the bottom. Oppressed parent leads to oppressed children. Sure, we can get them some nicer shit but few, if any, are capable ever leaving the bottom. Its not an "investment" so much as it is hush money.
Posts: 6747
November 15, 2012 1:02 PM
Posts: 2384
November 15, 2012 1:12 PM
Combad57 wrote:Here's a little more on makers vs takers. http://visualeconomics.creditloan.com/united-states-federal-tax-dollars/
Posts: 6797
November 15, 2012 1:32 PM
"I too, have never experienced a "meat raffle". I'm thinking about bringing the concept to Texas."
WestCoastBadger wrote:freddy4play wrote:My girlfriend came from one of the 10 poorest countries in the world. She is a permanent resident unable to vote. She is 30 years old, dirt poor for the most part due to starting out with literally nothing when she arrived in America 12 years ago. She is now going to UW to be a nurse. She is the quintessential person Romney is talking about. Poor, single, female, college student, with no steady health care until this month. She is unable to vote yet, but we talk politics quite a bit. I can guarantee that those are not the issues she was worried about. She is trying her hardest to not take out student loans, even putting tuition on her credit card. (Not a bad idea either if you are smart about how you handle it.) Too pigeonhole voters like her as freeloaders is insulting as can be coming from someone who has not struggled a day in his life. He is so out of touch with the reality of the middle class people of America it is astounding. That is why he lost the election. He needs to look in the mirror at his weaknesses for why he lost, not blame it on "freeloaders."She should just borrow money from her parents and start a business.
freddy4play wrote:My girlfriend came from one of the 10 poorest countries in the world. She is a permanent resident unable to vote. She is 30 years old, dirt poor for the most part due to starting out with literally nothing when she arrived in America 12 years ago. She is now going to UW to be a nurse. She is the quintessential person Romney is talking about. Poor, single, female, college student, with no steady health care until this month. She is unable to vote yet, but we talk politics quite a bit. I can guarantee that those are not the issues she was worried about. She is trying her hardest to not take out student loans, even putting tuition on her credit card. (Not a bad idea either if you are smart about how you handle it.) Too pigeonhole voters like her as freeloaders is insulting as can be coming from someone who has not struggled a day in his life. He is so out of touch with the reality of the middle class people of America it is astounding. That is why he lost the election. He needs to look in the mirror at his weaknesses for why he lost, not blame it on "freeloaders."
Posts: 1811
November 15, 2012 7:28 PM
Posts: 15789
November 15, 2012 7:55 PM
November 15, 2012 10:24 PM
Myles Long wrote: yanked wrote: TheMonsignor wrote: How so? Largely because of huge military installations. You can argue that military expenditures are more appropriate for the federal government, but now you are just arguing about what sort of "subsidy" you want to give people. I'd argue there is not much difference, in terms of makers v. takers, between a bloated war machine and a bloated food stamp program.Wow, that would be a stupid argument. At least I get to enjoy the Blue Angels....and watch us blow up shit on TV every now and again. My food stamps benefits include watching to see who gets gunned down every night. I have 3 kids in school between 3rd and 11th grade. For the classmates on gov't bennies, you can follow the lack of improvement through each grade, the faces and stories don't change. Food stamps, public housing, public health, etc aren't changing a fucking thing for kids at the bottom. Oppressed parent leads to oppressed children. Sure, we can get them some nicer shit but few, if any, are capable ever leaving the bottom. Its not an "investment" so much as it is hush money. Reading Yanked attempting to take on the Monsignor is like watching Baghdad Bob tell us all is well. The actual results on the field of play are about the same. It is like watching the Badgers take on Plattville in football.
yanked wrote: TheMonsignor wrote: How so? Largely because of huge military installations. You can argue that military expenditures are more appropriate for the federal government, but now you are just arguing about what sort of "subsidy" you want to give people. I'd argue there is not much difference, in terms of makers v. takers, between a bloated war machine and a bloated food stamp program.Wow, that would be a stupid argument. At least I get to enjoy the Blue Angels....and watch us blow up shit on TV every now and again. My food stamps benefits include watching to see who gets gunned down every night. I have 3 kids in school between 3rd and 11th grade. For the classmates on gov't bennies, you can follow the lack of improvement through each grade, the faces and stories don't change. Food stamps, public housing, public health, etc aren't changing a fucking thing for kids at the bottom. Oppressed parent leads to oppressed children. Sure, we can get them some nicer shit but few, if any, are capable ever leaving the bottom. Its not an "investment" so much as it is hush money.
Posts: 787
November 16, 2012 9:22 AM
yanked wrote: Myles Long wrote: yanked wrote: Wow, that would be a stupid argument. At least I get to enjoy the Blue Angels....and watch us blow up shit on TV every now and again. My food stamps benefits include watching to see who gets gunned down every night. I have 3 kids in school between 3rd and 11th grade. For the classmates on gov't bennies, you can follow the lack of improvement through each grade, the faces and stories don't change. Food stamps, public housing, public health, etc aren't changing a fucking thing for kids at the bottom. Oppressed parent leads to oppressed children. Sure, we can get them some nicer shit but few, if any, are capable ever leaving the bottom. Its not an "investment" so much as it is hush money. Reading Yanked attempting to take on the Monsignor is like watching Baghdad Bob tell us all is well. The actual results on the field of play are about the same. It is like watching the Badgers take on Plattville in football. Christmas card list:CPAMomIn-LawsSiblingsMylesAuntsUncles
Myles Long wrote: yanked wrote: Wow, that would be a stupid argument. At least I get to enjoy the Blue Angels....and watch us blow up shit on TV every now and again. My food stamps benefits include watching to see who gets gunned down every night. I have 3 kids in school between 3rd and 11th grade. For the classmates on gov't bennies, you can follow the lack of improvement through each grade, the faces and stories don't change. Food stamps, public housing, public health, etc aren't changing a fucking thing for kids at the bottom. Oppressed parent leads to oppressed children. Sure, we can get them some nicer shit but few, if any, are capable ever leaving the bottom. Its not an "investment" so much as it is hush money. Reading Yanked attempting to take on the Monsignor is like watching Baghdad Bob tell us all is well. The actual results on the field of play are about the same. It is like watching the Badgers take on Plattville in football.
yanked wrote: Wow, that would be a stupid argument. At least I get to enjoy the Blue Angels....and watch us blow up shit on TV every now and again. My food stamps benefits include watching to see who gets gunned down every night. I have 3 kids in school between 3rd and 11th grade. For the classmates on gov't bennies, you can follow the lack of improvement through each grade, the faces and stories don't change. Food stamps, public housing, public health, etc aren't changing a fucking thing for kids at the bottom. Oppressed parent leads to oppressed children. Sure, we can get them some nicer shit but few, if any, are capable ever leaving the bottom. Its not an "investment" so much as it is hush money.
Share This